|
NEWSLETTER: THE FILM ENTREPRENEUR
Indies Save the Day Once
Again
December 2000
Another great year for indies is about to end. The small films have taken up the slack
from the lack of quality big-budget films. The studio system is still beset by runaway
costs as well as the runaway films. As usual, some carefully crafted baby films have
outshone the big guys. Billy Elliot started small and is still selling tickets. At
press time, the film's U.S. box office is $16M, barely a star's salary on a studio film,
and still growing. The film is nominated for a Golden Globe Best Picture award and rumored
to be a candidate for a Best Picture Oscar. Its success has come mainly from
word-of-mouth. Another baby film is You Can Count On Me, which tied for the Grand
Jury Prize at Sundance 2000. Released in November, the film is slowly building as the
distributor increases its movie house presence.
On the moderate-to-high end of the independent spectrum, DreamWork's Gladiator is
also a contender for a Golden Globe Best Picture, as is Director Steven Soderbergh's Traffic,
which hasn't yet opened as this issue goes to press. Which brings us back to a criticism
we hear every year. Films made by heavily financed, larger production companies are not
indies. In this publication, they are. If the production isn't controlled by one of the
six major U.S. studios, they are independent. A film doesn't have to be edgy or doomed to
boxoffice failure to be an independent. It doesn't have to have an indie distributor to be
independent. The definition always has been the source of financing. And for all those who
decry the commercial success of 1999's The Blair Witch Project, that
film will be bringing equity investors into the independent business for years to come.
Digital filmmaking, however, is making
slow progress. True, the indie festivals are seeing more entries than ever. However, there
are still only 15 digital theaters in the country. But with the economic problems of
exhibitors, digital film will not be a real business in our immediate future. And many potential Internet outlets have either shut down abruptly or been taken
over by other companies. And many filmmakers seem to have lost their short film product in
the chaos. The reason is clear. The business plans either were non-existent or assumed
that venture capitalists would support sites indefinitely until sufficient revenue sources
magically appeared. Now Web companies must go back to basics and create companies that can
survive on their own. Hint: 15-year-olds still spend money at the mall rather than on the
Internet.
|